<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-US" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Paul Ingles - Ruby Influenced C# Comments</title>
  <id>tag:www.oobaloo.co.uk,2008:/articles/2008/5/7/ruby-influenced-csharp/comments</id>
  <generator version="0.7.3" uri="http://mephistoblog.com">Mephisto Noh-Varr</generator>
  <link href="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2008/5/7/ruby-influenced-csharp/comments.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <link href="/articles/2008/5/7/ruby-influenced-csharp" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
  <updated>2008-06-04T19:03:09Z</updated>
  <entry xml:base="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/">
    <author>
      <name>Matthew Wastrodowski</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:www.oobaloo.co.uk,2008-05-07:13536:16449</id>
    <published>2008-06-04T19:03:09Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-04T19:03:09Z</updated>
    <link href="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2008/5/7/ruby-influenced-csharp" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'Ruby Influenced C#' by Matthew Wastrodowski</title>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As a Rubyist just starting to do a little php for a company in need(from thoughtworks US btw), I feel your same pain, but in php. I&#8217;ve been researching for the past hour how to get a nice map function that will call a method on each of my objects. Arg. At least php is fast :) And I got PhpSpec working at least like it would in rails. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers &lt;/p&gt;</content>  </entry>
  <entry xml:base="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/">
    <author>
      <name>isaiah</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:www.oobaloo.co.uk,2008-05-07:13536:13655</id>
    <published>2008-05-08T11:17:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-08T11:17:39Z</updated>
    <link href="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2008/5/7/ruby-influenced-csharp" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'Ruby Influenced C#' by isaiah</title>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;I had the same experience, as a Smalltalk inspired C# developer. i find myself using a lot less conditional code and a lot less loops and iterator&lt;/p&gt;</content>  </entry>
  <entry xml:base="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/">
    <author>
      <name>Alexey Romanov</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:www.oobaloo.co.uk,2008-05-07:13536:13653</id>
    <published>2008-05-08T10:55:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-08T10:55:33Z</updated>
    <link href="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2008/5/7/ruby-influenced-csharp" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'Ruby Influenced C#' by Alexey Romanov</title>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As a Haskell-inspired C# programmer, I completely agree :)&lt;/p&gt;</content>  </entry>
  <entry xml:base="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/">
    <author>
      <name>Ron</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:www.oobaloo.co.uk,2008-05-07:13536:13612</id>
    <published>2008-05-07T21:47:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-07T21:47:20Z</updated>
    <link href="http://www.oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2008/5/7/ruby-influenced-csharp" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'Ruby Influenced C#' by Ron</title>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As a ruby-loving programmer that programs C# every day, this post says exactly what I thought when I just made the switch. As you say, lambda expressions will really change the change the feel of it, and we still maintain the static typing!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On a side-note, you can actually do (as you probably know):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;foreach (Person person in FindAllPeople()) {
  &#8230;
}&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FindAllPeople().ForEach(delegate(Person person) {
  Console.WriteLine(person.Name);
});&lt;/p&gt;</content>  </entry>
</feed>
